Contact
LifestreamNobody in their right mind would argue in favour of being allowed to take photos wherever and of whoever they like.
I would argue that very thing.
I do not like where this is going. Not at all. I guess it is only a matter of time before we get struck with this freedom infringement as well. As it currently stands, photography in Sweden is open in ALL public places. Nothing anyone can do about that. If you take shots ON private property you might be asked to leave (but nothing more). Not if you stand on public property and photograph OVER private property however. It’s all a question of where you are physically present. Doesn’t matter if you’re a bit voyeuristic and take candid shots through people’s bed room windows, you’re still allowed to do that.
The only thing that has traditionally been regulated is military sites. In such case, should you be caught photographing even OVER certain secure sites, your camera might be confiscated and you will be sent on your way with a written receipt of the expropriation.
And this I stand by. No one can regulate the usage of an imaging device in any area to which the public has got unhindered and free access. Nor should the consequences of shooting on private property, say McDonalds or Burger King, add up to more than a brusk (albeit slightly silly) recommendation. It is interesting that this is also where I first came in contact with silly rules like this. American hamburger joints. I’ve heard stories that the company policy doesn’t allow for photography, even in Sweden where this is in conflict with local laws.
If you are out in public then you are out in public. It’s as simple as that. Even if I too can feel that it is uncomfortable there shouldn’t be anything anyone can do about it. Don’t like it? Stay at home.
The times are sure changing. Bit by bit the pieces fit.
