<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EpiServer again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://battleangel.org/2005/01/06/episerver-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://battleangel.org/2005/01/06/episerver-again/</link>
	<description>Tell us what you despise; by this are you truly known.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Björn Hallberg</title>
		<link>http://battleangel.org/2005/01/06/episerver-again/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Björn Hallberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-439</guid>
		<description>No PHP sites? Isn't that the point. Obviously I would have chosen a PHP solution with a MySQL database. Both seem to do fine for some of the largest websites on the Internet so for this purpose they would both be more than sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the specific CMS I would of course need to look at the requirements. Specifically multi-user support and how / if department staff and / or lecturers need personalized accounts to log in and have their own course content and / or personal sites within the CMS. Or if all of this is in fact handled by dedicated CMS editors, or if staff log in with a master account.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would I be able to come up with a better solution? Maybe not. Perhaps just an equally bad one. But one that would be open-source and that wouldn't be hanging on to Microsoft's skirt tails. This EpiServer just reeks of nepotism, nationalism and hysterical capitalism (as in anti-opensource sentiments) all fermenting incompetence and stifling true innovation. For me, this was a wakeup call that made me realize that Universities can no longer be trusted and have in fact been infiltrated, colonized if you will, by the economic hegemony. &#34;Et in Arcadia ego&#34; I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No PHP sites? Isn&#8217;t that the point. Obviously I would have chosen a PHP solution with a MySQL database. Both seem to do fine for some of the largest websites on the Internet so for this purpose they would both be more than sufficient.</p>
<p>As for the specific CMS I would of course need to look at the requirements. Specifically multi-user support and how / if department staff and / or lecturers need personalized accounts to log in and have their own course content and / or personal sites within the CMS. Or if all of this is in fact handled by dedicated CMS editors, or if staff log in with a master account.</p>
<p>Would I be able to come up with a better solution? Maybe not. Perhaps just an equally bad one. But one that would be open-source and that wouldn&#8217;t be hanging on to Microsoft&#8217;s skirt tails. This EpiServer just reeks of nepotism, nationalism and hysterical capitalism (as in anti-opensource sentiments) all fermenting incompetence and stifling true innovation. For me, this was a wakeup call that made me realize that Universities can no longer be trusted and have in fact been infiltrated, colonized if you will, by the economic hegemony. &quot;Et in Arcadia ego&quot; I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weiron i Ottan</title>
		<link>http://battleangel.org/2005/01/06/episerver-again/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Weiron i Ottan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-438</guid>
		<description>So what open-source CMS would u have choosen instead? &lt;br /&gt;(- No PHP sites thanks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what open-source CMS would u have choosen instead? <br />(- No PHP sites thanks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
