Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007
Switzerland, Finland and Sweden are the world’s most competitive economies according to The Global Competitiveness Report 2006-2007, released by the World Economic Forum on 26 September 2006. Denmark, Singapore, the United States, Japan, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom complete the top ten list, but the United States shows the most pronounced drop, falling from first to sixth.
So ironically, high-tax countries like Sweden, remain highly competitive. The obvious reason for this being that the tax level isn’t everything. Just as a large or small government isn’t really the issue. The false dichotomy hides the fact that one can have a government that works, whether it is large or small, and that taxes, if used efficiently, selectively and progressively do not impede a nation’s competitiveness. Or erode confidence in the state for that matter. It should be noted though that high-tax nations are often misrepresented by broad, gung ho statistics which cover total tax revenue and that the Sweden for instance combines a fairly low corporate tax with a fairly high income tax. Taken at face value, the facts would otherwise seem irreconcilable.
According to the OECD, Sweden is also leader in wealth distribution, so called social transfers.
So in summary, the Scandinavian mixed economies remain strong and do pretty much what they set out to do, namely maximize competitiveness while redistributing wealth.
Contact
Lifestream






Said that I would pride myself of being swedish citizen (och ibland tänkar jag på allvar att flytta…), many would argue that northern countries have a much lower density and smaller populations, which makes organization and transport a lot easier: this would account for the better competitiveness.
I’d gladly pay a lot more taxes to have the level of service you have in Sweden.
I was surprised to see that Italy taxes are so high with respect to other countries, but is quite obvious as tax-evasion is our national sport.
This leads me to think that it’s more a matter of culture that strictly of taxes.
The scandinavian example just tells us that, in a really different (yet still european) context and a really different culture high taxes are not.
I would rather correlate the competitiveness with the money spent in research and innovation:
http://epp.eurostat.ec.euro…