Battleangel

January 27th. Around the globe, world leaders were eagerly falling into line, towing the Zionist line. We are urged to remember past atrocities. Well, just the one actually. One that happened to take place in the west and did befall white people. How original indeed.

So here we are with a Holocaust remembrance day out of all the moments and tragedies in history. Bottom line is that the remembrance day is frighteningly selective, with a western bias even, and worse still, has an ulterior motive to it. It may seem heartless to deny people their right to commemorate but those that hijacked this event for their own political purposes should have thought of that. It’s simply not my problem. Now the Holocaust is truly a piece of power politics and it must be treated as such, and so the gloves come off.

And on the eve of this disgrace, the UN General Assembly was manhandled into voting for a condemnation of Holocaust denial. After all, who could go against that and live to tell the tale. Most nations were so afraid of the consequences that they had to get in on the sponsoring of the resolution already. Fortunately, the resolution carries as little weight as the tons of resolutions that Israel and its salivating supporter, the United States, have chosen to disregard. But make no mistake, some parties will make the most of this event. They will not let us forget, ever. And this will be the only resolution they’ll applaud, ever. At the end of the day, only Iran had the bravery to both criticise the resolution and consequently reject it. Everyone else remained dumbfounded or under the heel of Zionists or the United States. Plus the news article above managed to once again belie the statements of Iran’s president. Then you know something is terribly wrong. Because according to the mainstream media, we can say with certainty that so and so many million people died over 60 years ago, but we cannot accurately translate and relay what this one guy said a few months back.

Now they are likely going even further, proclaiming that the freedom from anti-Semitism should be a human right. Meanwhile more and more schools are instituting mandatory Holocaust education. Without resorting to conspiracy theories I can see how this wouldn’t seem controversial to those that are ignorant of both history and the contemporary world. If you don’t get power politics and have no grasp of the dealings of Zionists organizations and don’t care about Israel’s crimes then obviously playing up the Holocaust wouldn’t seem a bit controversial. So lets be fair and acknowledge that we are not dealing with a ZOG, rather the all too familiar ship of fools. I can’t say which implication is worse though.

Holocaust remembrance and Holocaust studies remains a fiercely western-dominated art. One that is used to marginalize not only the suffering of non-westeners in general, but also directly prevent justice anywhere else in the world. There simply isn’t enough room between all the Holocaust remembrances and resolutions. Plus, according to doctrine, the Holocaust is unique so there is really no point arguing about it. And besides, what old or new imperial power would stand up and volunteer that they committed crimes that by far supersede the death toll of the Holocaust? Not many I’d reckon. Or speaking of domestic atrocities, would Russia or China step forward? Unlikely, it’s not a winning slogan, and most people would rather forget. Well, not everyone as is evident from the remembrance day and some people do have something to gain from capitalizing on their victimhood.

As for the motives behind the remembrance day or indeed the specifics of the Holocaust itself, consider this. Is it likely that the very same people who have been exposed as lying to the us on the topic of Israel and how it came to be would be kind enough to tell the whole truth on the Holocaust or its application as an intellectual bludgeon. It doesn’t seem likely as the two topics are intimately linked and as weakening one weakens the other. Zionists may give you the correct time of day but beyond that I’d be highly suspicious and check the sources.

So what could be more appropriate on this day than to refer to Mark Weber, the director of the much besmirched Institute for Historical Review, and the presentation (“Holocaust Remembrance: Behind the Campaign”) he recorded for the Holocaust conference in Teheran:

See also Holocaust Remembrance: Behind the Campaign, Part 2
It’s easy to see why Jewish-Zionist interests have done their very best to demonize Weber’s work. Because unlike them, he manages to come off calm and controlled and without referring to God (which is bizarre in more ways than one given the normally secular position of Zionists) or other peculiar source material.

On a related matter: The Swedish historian, Jan Bernhoff, who attended the Holocaust conference in Teheran, was relieved of his job just the other day. Now that sets an example for anyone who would dare question doctrine again. You can’t question anything if you’re starving after all. Free speech in Sweden … well … not so much as it turns out. In what other area besides the Holocaust could something like that happen? Informal influence, it seems, serves the same function as Holocaust denial laws and that, indeed, is real power. In that respect, the Holocaust is indeed unique.